Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Why PSD2 will make it possible for customers to build their own banks - CRO FROM MONEY CLOUD

ONE OF THE BEST ARTICLE WHICH I COME ACROSS

2018 is going to be the year that permanently changes the way we see, and the way we use banks. Banks in their traditional form are going to start to disappear, and be replaced by what is known as banking technology – which is a completely different beast.

The Revised Payment Service Directive, or PSD2 as it more commonly called, is set to come into force at the beginning of next year, and “gamechanger” barely begins to describe the effect this new set of regulations governing the use of banking data will have.


PSD2 will oblige banks to give third party providers access to their customer’s accounts using Application Programming Interfaces, or APIs.

Using simple call and response technology, any firm will be able to compete tooth and nail with major banks across the same suite of services – but in the main, two new types of agent will be created.

Firstly, AISPs – Account Information Service Providers. These types of agents are service providers who have access to banks customers’ account information. This will allow them to provide customers with aggregated data from all of their various accounts, keep track of their spending, and use the data they collect to make recommendations about how best users can manage their money.

Secondly, PISPs – Payment Initiation Service Providers – PISPs are able to initiate payments on behalf of their users; allowing them to pay friends, or bills, or move money abroad, or shop at brick and mortar stores or online stores, in a wide variety of different ways.

We have already seen disruptive AISP and PISP services emerge and threaten the big banks’ hegemony over services such as Direct Debits, money transfer, customer product recommendations and real-time information (e.g. balance statements or overdraft alerts) supplied via open APIs.

But when PSD2 becomes law, the playing field will not only be levelled, it will be the banks that will be forced onto the back foot.

The banks’ labour-intensive sets of systems and controls will put them at a disadvantage when compared to smaller, more agile service providers which use only the latest technology and have no “legacy” infrastructure to replace or update.

Banks are also likely to lose the “PR War” too; their products and services have been unpopular and mistrusted ever since the global financial collapse of 2008, whereas modern fintech firms are unsullied by what has gone before and receive favourable press, as well as plenty of encouragement from their venture capitalist backers.

But it is not all bad news for banks. Firstly, they have a major advantage over the “challenger” fintech firms in that they have huge existing customer bases – they need only get their post PSD2 services right and it will be easier for them to persuade customers to stick with them rather than transfer their business to a newer, greener service.

Secondly, and somewhat ironically, some of the most successful fintech startups are, in fact, funded by the big banks. Take Atom Bank, which recently received an £83m venture round investment from Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, BBVA, one of Spain’s biggest banks.

Or Starling Bank; run by an ex-banker, and backed by a hedge fund manager, with ex bankers and ex Financial Conduct Authority big-wigs on the board.

But from the customer’s perspective, the real difference will be experienced via the PISPs. It is the payments industry that is really set to change the face of the modern banking industry.

The biggest difference will be that payment card usage will drop – by between 9-40%, depending on your source. Eventually, payment cards may be phased out altogether.

Mobile payments, payments using wearables, payments using any Internet of Things connected devices, payments across messaging services, payments over social media. All of these services, possible already, will begin to come even more to the fore.

It isn’t hard to see big tech companies steal market share away from big banks through more agile payments services. PSD2 makes it possible for almost any firm; Apple, Facebook, even SnapChat; to act like a bank and offer the same services – but it does not work the other way.

Natwest, Santander, Barclays are not going to launch hugely popular social media platforms anytime soon – although don’t be surprised if they try – it represents their best chance of staying relevant to their invaluable Millennial customers.

But to return to the point in the title of this post, it should be customers who are most excited about this obscure regulation, PSD2, they have probably never heard of.

It gives customers’ choices galore, and significantly empowers them. For example, a merchant that pays lower fees for processing Apple Pay transactions will be desperate for customers to pay this way, and will try to entice customers to do so.

Or, challenger banks keen to wrestle customers off of big banks will offer too-good-to-be-true sign-up terms. The market for loans will become more competitive. It will become easier to open a new account. Money transfer will become fee-free and immediate.

And customers will be able to pick and choose the services they want – in effect, they will be able to construct their own banks, and maintain a transparent, real-time view of all their different accounts thanks to PSD2.

Overwhelmingly, it is the customer that has the power. They can ask any service provider, for any service, and they will get it – with bells on! They can build their own bespoke suite of services and be the masters of all the accounts they survey, chopping and changing to find the best value at the click of a mouse, or swipe of a screen. It is a future that is tantalisingly close.

And we haven’t even mentioned the blockchain and digital currencies!

The EU decided to push through PSD2 in response to the failings of the first Payments Services Directive, which many observers felt didn’t go far enough in democratising the powers of big banks.
The European Commission, via PSD2, has demonstrated that it wants to achieve 3 major goals. Improve innovation, protect customers better and make internet payments and online accounts access more secure.

But it may well be the customer who has the final word.

Huw Jenkins is CTO of The Money Cloud; Huw has been working in the FX industry, helping to accurately compare the price of sending money overseas offered by different agents and services for over 12 years. At The Money Cloud, Huw and the team are building a holistic platform from which users will be able to access all of their financial accounts, send money overseas, and apply for new products and services in just a few clicks.

Instant payments: US TCH & SCT Inst launch, but are banks ready?

The launch of The Clearing House (TCH) real-time payments (RTP) platform in the US and of Europe’s SCT Inst scheme is an indication that instant payments are at last going global, but how ready are banks?

The first new payment and clearing infrastructure in over 40 years is now operational in the US after TCH RTP had its first test on 13 November when $3.50 was moved between BNY Mellon and US Bank, prompting the latter’s CEO, Andy Cecere, to say in a statement how “excited” he was.
His counterpart at BNY Mellon, Ian Stewart, hailed it as “one of the most important payment transformation efforts in our industry”. Further transactions have since run involving Citi, J.P. Morgan, PNC and SunTrust, among other early adopters as the system ramps up.


However, the RTP platform is not expected to reach ubiquity until 2020. TCH hopes that ‘by the end of 2018 half of all American depositors will have access to the system’ as the big banks migrate to it. Connecting to the core, integrating and aligning it with internal financial crime compliance activities won’t be easy for banks. But 2020 is a long time to make American consumers and corporates wait for instant payments (IP).


Large processing firms, such as Fiserv and others, are expected to serve the connectivity and processing needs of smaller US banks, credit unions and others that lack the scale or budget to execute their own migration project, but the wait will still be frustrating.


RTP supports fast, irrevocable IP, standardised messaging and data carrying capabilities in the US, which mean new services and functionality such as mobile phone number initiation, liquidity and payment monitoring services should be possible in the future.


The technology was supplied by MasterCard-owned VocaLink and the system built with the collaborative effort of TCH’s 25 owner banks, but it is open to all US depository institutions.
RTP adheres to the objectives of the US Federal Reserve (Fed) Faster Payments Task Force, effectively the scheme overseer, giving the country the chance to finally catch up with other more advanced real-time nations such as Denmark, Singapore and so on but only if banks connect to it.


Europe
European regulators, its central bank and payment service providers (PSPs) are also hopeful of speeding up euro payments. The continent’s new single euro payments area (SEPA) instant credit transfer (SCT Inst) scheme will enable fast euro-denominated payments and new services to be rolled out. Various SCT Inst-compliant clearing and settlement mechanisms (CSMs) are slowly proliferating across the continent.


Nine CSMs, such as France’s Stet automated clearing house (ACH) and Equens Worldline, declared their adherence to the voluntary SCT Inst scheme upon its launch on 21 November, but many more still need to follow.


EBA Clearing’s RT1 platform will initially provide much of the pan-European cross-border ‘reachability’ allowing instant payments to be made across the continent. Often this will be via a cross-border partnership, as in the case of Spain’s Iberpay where the ACH will handle domestic SCT Inst-compliant payments itself but use RT1 to reach far-flung corners of Europe.


The banks are lagging behind too. The European Payments Council (EPC), which designed the voluntary scheme rulebook, said 585 PSPs – only 15% of the total in Europe – were offering instant euro payment services on the launch date, across eight countries from Austria to Estonia, Italy to Spain. A lot of the initial volume was from RT1.


The slow uptake means there are a lot of banks and alternative PSPs that still to adhere to the SCT Inst scheme. In common with its US counterpart, the EPC is not envisaging full uptake anytime soon either. It is predicting PSP uptake will only reach 50% by 2020 following the non-mandatory launch on 21 November. Perhaps it should be made mandatory to speed things up?


SCT Inst is intended to reach the 34 SEPA Countries in Europe including Poland, France, UK and so on. It will encourage adoption of the ISO20022 messaging standard and give its users the ability to:
  • Move up to 15,000 euros from one account in Europe to another. The limit may rise later.
  • Maximum of ten seconds allowed.
  • Operate on a constant 24×7 basis.
It shares the fast settlement and 24×7 operational stance of its US TCH equivalent and other IP schemes around the world. Australia, for instance, has its own similar new payment platform (NPP) planned for 2018.


Numbers in Europe should pick up when large German banks, with the biggest euro flows, move fully next summer to the SCT Inst scheme. For now, a lot of smaller German and other nation’s banks have moved, but the volume figures need more Tier 1 banks to migrate to radically increase uptake.


It is not an easy task to migrate to an IP scheme – whether in the US, EU, Australia or wherever – but if banks want to retain payment volume, customers and the capacity to offer value-adding mobile or liquidity services on new infrastructures then they need to move quickly. Otherwise, alternative PSPs may look to take advantage of these new platforms themselves, where permitted, and to win flow for themselves.

Monday, December 04, 2017

Virtual Card

When it comes to payments in the B2B world, customers are looking for more convenient ways to pay their bills. With the latest technological advancements, their options are expanding. As with any new technology, however, new challenges arrive that can slow down the invoice-to-cash process. But if a supplier has the right A/R process in place, new technology doesn’t have to mean that there will be new challenges to overcome.

Virtual cards, also known as Single-Use Accounts (SUA), are among the latest in payments technologies. They are auto-generated credit card numbers that A/P departments can send to suppliers as a link contained in an email, for a one-time-use payment. Their growing popularity with customers is due to a variety of factors.


One reason is that virtual cards provide A/P departments visibility and control over the buyer’s payments. Another reason is that they automate the account reconciliation process – the more automated the process, the less chance for human error. Additionally, there is an increased level of security on the payments side. We’ve already discussed that virtual cards have a one-time use, randomly generated number. But they can also be set to the exact cost of the bill and can be set to expire after a specific amount of time, reducing the chance of theft or fraud.


On the flip side, this emerging payment process introduces new challenges for the suppliers and the A/R side of the invoice-to-cash process:
  • Processes inefficiencies
One challenge is that the infrastructure that supports virtual card payments does not currently integrate neatly with ERP systems to enable straight-through processing. In addition, while the issuing of a single-use number is automated, the supplier processing side of it is not. Consequently, A/R departments receiving virtual card payments often have to manually retrieve the card number and remittance information, process the payment and then manually apply the cash into their ERP system.
  • Interchange fees
If a supplier is given a virtual card number for payment, this will often require them to pay an interchange fee on each transaction that is completed. While these interchange fees can differ based on the type of card used, fees can get expensive, costing suppliers an average of 2.5% of the payment per transaction.
  • Security gaps
While the A/P department may start using virtual cards due to its improved security, on the A/R side, there can actually be some increased security risks. A company receiving credit card payments, for example, needs to be PCI-compliant, which means they need to comply with Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standard (DSS) in order to host credit card data securely with a hosting provider.
Additionally, while buyers may have a secure system to send the virtual card payment email, the supplier’s email may not be as secure. Ensuring appropriate security protocols can be costly for many suppliers and can open up businesses to data breach risks.

The future of virtual card payments

Despite its challenges, virtual card payments are not going away. In fact, their usage is growing almost 10% annually. By 2021, virtual card spending is expected to surpass that of traditional purchasing cards and checks. And as we are seeing that increase in the volume of emailed virtual card payments, we are also seeing further strains being put on businesses’ A/R departments.
But that strain can be relieved if the A/R department implements its own automated solution to process those virtual card payments. A part of that solution should include a comprehensive electronic invoice presentment and payment (EIPP) portal. A good portal will give A/R teams the ability to completely automate the payments process, and that includes virtual card payments.


When searching for an EIPP portal, suppliers should find one that can accept payments, generate the payment file, easily integrate with their ERP and then automatically close out each invoice as it is paid. Additionally, it should be PCI-compliant and should incorporate the highest security standards and latest encryption technologies.

Diagram: How Virtual Card Capture works


While virtual cards are not yet mainstream today, they are projected to become commonplace in the near future. As companies utilize more automation in their businesses, virtual cards will be a natural part of the B2B payment process. The ability to handle this payment process seamlessly will result in more predictable cash flow and higher customer satisfaction